Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Definition of Qatil-e-Amid Evidence Sentencing, the question was whether the pellet used was similar to the alleged pistol? It can be concluded that as far as the weapon / pistol of the crime is concerned, it has not been proved at first that it was said that the pistol was used in the commission of the crime and the recovery of the pistol from the second suspect was suspected. Remained unaffected. And the wash cannot be found that it was alleged that he committed the crime on his own, considering the fact that the weapon of crime was not recovered and his only witness was a dying declaration. And the motive was not explicitly established, the sentence of life imprisonment was up to 10 years in rigorous imprisonment while the court decision below was retained in other cases.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD SOHAIL SIDDIQUI v. Mst. PARVEEN alias MUNNI 2010 MLD 1433
• MONAZZA OBAID v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION (PIAC), through Managing Director 2010 PLC(CS) 1436
• GULZAR AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1438
• SHAHNAWAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1458
• AXACT (PVT.) LTD. Through Company Secretary v. ASAD MANZOOR 2010 MLD 1460
• AYAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1469
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 1472
• GHULAM ASGHAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1474

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocate from Tall lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes