MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Section 2452/6 386/2 392/5 355/9 353/999 / House House corruption, extortion, robbery, kidnapping, preventing a public servant from paying his duties using criminal force, disclosure of private complaints section The statements of witnesses listed under CRPC and Section 202, CRPC, were before the trial court, which must see whether the allegations against the accused were made earlier. This was not a step for appreciation. In order to give evidence or the benefit of the doubt to the suspects, the private complaint was quite clear, which the aforementioned statements of the material aspects of the Complaints Commissioner and other witnesses supported, at least to the extent of establishing a case against the accused, As a result of the refusal to dismiss the unidentified order, the complaint was set aside and sent to trial court with instructions to take the matter seriously, and issue a summons to the accused and students. According to the law, the approval of the trial was accepted accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
