Section 2 302 / at34 Definition of conviction evidence The evidence in this case was primarily limited to the statements of three real brothers, one of whom was the complainant and the other was a witness who was presented in court while the third. One was left exposed without any legal excuse No independent person was witnessed either by the locality or the material aspects of the case and the presence of witnesses and they were inactive, on the occasion of their presence. Doubtful or otherwise. His act of involving his own brother, the deceased widow in the murder of her husband without any evidence or evidence, also raised suspicion in his justice that the torch recovery affected the complainant who He was allegedly handed over to the police, who was the sole subject in the case and was not without doubt, the case was not established beyond the scope of any reasonable doubt, the accused against the accused. And the verdict of punishment was not lasting. The law, under the circumstances, is the principle that chains of criminals can be released to prevent the innocent from being punished. In a single case that raised suspicion because of the crime, it was enough to acquit the accused from trial. And for one reason, born of the same evidence, it was enough to dispel all the evidence, in which case the applicable judgment was set aside and the accused was acquitted of the charge of the case. And they were released.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
