MRS. MUMTAZ MAQSOOD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION
Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitutional Reasoning Reasoning Principles of Judiciary The application of the constitutional application filed by the applicant to the Director (C&M) by Secretary STC Was followed by praise. The Federal Tax Ombudsman, however, is satisfied with the payment of the prize money and the receipt of the prize money, with the request that the claim clause `b the application has been applied by the authorities, the application dismissed. The applicant had filed a second constitutional petition, which was not challenged or tried to review the order passed in the previous constitutional petition, once the petitioner filed the petition It was ordered that the prayer of the constitutional petition was not accepted, then the applicant was silent and the claimant. In keeping with the impugned order and the fact that there was a constitutional petition before it, the court decided on the basis of that letter. And that the prayers contained in this constitutional petition should be satisfied with the same order. The second constitutional petition filed by the petitioner fell on all the four lines on the principle of justice, in the present case not only the applicant and the respondent were the same, but The constitutional application was ultimately decided in accordance with the order which was acted upon and the finality was obtained as no appeal or revision was filed against the same second constitutional application which was affected by the principle of constructive race Judasta, only Excluded on this basis \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
