Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR versus STATE

Section 365 A / 34 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (e) Abduction or kidnapping for property, valuable security, etc. The benefit of the suspect was not consistent with the prosecution's testimony in his position. Full of notable contradictions that made the prosecutor's case suspicious, the accused was entitled to take advantage of the charges but dismissed it as a matter of fact, not as a matter of doubt. had gone.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Mir MURTAZA PARHIYAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1877
• MUHAMMAD SABIR v. Maj. (Rtd.) MUHAMMAD KHALID NAEEM CHEEMA 2010 CLC 1879
• Mrs. TAHIRA SULTANA v. SALEEM RAJPUT 2010 YLR 1883
• NAJAF ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1885
• Syed ALI SHAH v. State 2010 MLD 1892
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. FAZAL AND SONS (PVT.) LTD 2010 CLC 1895
• THE STATE/ANTI NARCOTICS FORCE v. MEHBOOB UR REHMAN AFRIDI 2010 MLD 1896
• AHSANULLAH A. KHAIRI v. State 2010 YLR 1902

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Khushab lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes