Find a Lawyer

IRFANUDDIN versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD.

Clause 42 and Civil 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O IX, Rr 8 & 9 Appeal for dismissal of suit for illegal prosecution and justification for dismissal and delay in dismissal of application for permanent dismissal Was filed by the prosecution, the plaintiff filed an application for reinstatement approximately 6 months after his dismissal. The plaintiff delayed affirming any of his objections to the consolation, so that the plaintiff The reasons set out for the late condolences, in fact, appear and the request for permission by the defendant's lawyer to verify any objections. Was delayed in filing a restitution application The defendant's lawyer also had no objection to the restoration of the case as the plaintiff's petition requested that the affidavit be filed in support of the recovery request. The reasons in the names were found to be genuine and appropriate by the plaintiff and the reason for the reason for the needle's recovery was allowed to apply and the suit was restored to its original status.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• JANTAN BIBI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 164
• OPTIMUS LIMITED through Manager Human Resources v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNION, SINDH through Joint Director Labour South 2010 PLC 166
• RABOO v. ABDUL REHMAN 2010 MLD 166
• FORBES FORBES & CAMPBELL CO., through Company Secretary v. EBRAHIM TRUST through Managing Trustee 2010 PLD 170
• ZAIN-UL-ABIDIN v. State 2010 MLD 173
• REHMATUDDIN v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2010 PLC 174
• KARACHI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY through President v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V, KARACHI 2010 PLC 177
• Mst. AFSHAN alias AAPI v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, JAMSHORO 2010 YLR 178

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Jalozai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes