The use of derogatory remarks in connection with Sections 497 (2) and 196 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 295A / 295C of religious sentiment and bail of the Holy Prophet cannot be legalized without the order of the Complaints Authority ? As mentioned in section 196, the CCP had to consider the lesser offense while the bail application was decided in three versions, one by the complainant, the other by the Investigation Officer and the third by the accused himself and Even then there was no effect after that. Recording proof of which version was correct, the accused denied the allegations that he was a practicing doctor and assistant professor at a medical college, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). No fool could speak a word against it and cause no harm to faith or belief. Anyone accused of his profession or religion, according to the indictment, was targeted by his professional rivals, alleging that he was found innocent in the investigation. So much concrete evidence should be presented to link the accused to the commission of the crime and to explain the extraordinary delay in filing an FIR for a delay of eleven days and the nature of the crime is still pending in the trial and its case. Lies inside it. Scope of section 497 (2), CCP demanded further investigation, the accused was admitted on bail under conditions \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
