Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAHIR MAJEED versus SECURITY LEASING CORPORATION LTD.

Section 9 Contract Act (IX of 1872), sections 124 and 125 suit for recovery of debt amount which contains a bank lease agreement which contains the indemnity clause in which the bank in the event of termination of the contract by the respondent Responsible for damages, the termination of the bank's agreement on the defendant after the payment of the deferred lease amount cannot affect the payment of the defendant's compensation provided by the bank Will also be entitled which were not adjusted against the amount of the lease distributed \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• SABIR AHMED v. NAZEER AHMED 2010 CLD 344
• SAMAD BALOCH v. State 2010 MLD 344
• ALLAHDINO v. GHULAM MUSTAFA 2010 YLR 346
• MUBASHIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI EAST 2010 CLC 346
• MUHAMMAD GHUFRAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 351
• AMMANULLAH SOOMRO v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIR LINES CORPORATION through Managing Director/Chairman 2010 YLR 352
• ZULFIQAR AHMED KHAN v. STATION COMMANDER, STATION HEADQUARTERS, KARACHI 2010 CLC 354
• Khawaja MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ BABA v. MOIZ TAYYAB ALI 2010 MLD 356

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates Wan Radha Ram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes