Find a Lawyer

AMMANULLAH SOOMRO versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIR LINES CORPORATION THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O IX, R 7 Prosecution The petitioner's personal affidavit, along with the application for the reinstatement of the constitutional application for non-constitutionality, including his Said they were not aware of this. Applicant's appointment on the relevant date of the applicant was informed that the date made by the applicant and his lawyer was not informed as the matter appeared in the High's Daily Work List. The court; it was that the professional duty of the lawyer for the applicant was that he should take notice of the case hearing for the relevant date. Further, the applicant had to be careful in pursuing his case or else there was a request for restoration of the petition which was banned at the time and no such petition was granted for such delay.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ALLAHDINO v. GHULAM MUSTAFA 2010 YLR 346
• MUBASHIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI EAST 2010 CLC 346
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR MAJEED v. SECURITY LEASING CORPORATION LTD. 2010 CLD 351
• MUHAMMAD GHUFRAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 351
• ZULFIQAR AHMED KHAN v. STATION COMMANDER, STATION HEADQUARTERS, KARACHI 2010 CLC 354
• Khawaja MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ BABA v. MOIZ TAYYAB ALI 2010 MLD 356
• GULZAR NATHANI v. NAEEM AHMAD 2010 YLR 358
• INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ADVISORS ASSOCIATION through General Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Manpower, Islamabad 2010 PLC 359

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

when you need a advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes