Comparison of the Articles 84, Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8, 39 and 54 of the scope, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant for possession, cancellation, collection of articles, damages, permanent injunction, while the defendant Has filed a lawsuit for specific performance. The agreement was tagged for both suits so that the High Court had sufficient powers to practice comparing signatures to avoid any conflicting decisions. The existence of any law was not present in the testimony of the law, or in any other law which may prohibit such comparisons, in the interim period the office was directed that the R&P of the lawsuit be filed by the defendant. To be tagged with action. Next date
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
