Section 497 (5) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 377 murder MAM and Sodomy bail, cancellation of the names of the accused, although it did not appear in the FIR, was registered against the unidentified persons, But that cannot be ignored. The dead body of a five-year-old boy was recovered from a water tank in a policeman's house, revealing that the accused had confessed to the investigating officer that he had strangled himself after the misconduct. The victim in the water tank and the witness who witnessed the incident made such a confessional statement even though it did not result, but the Investigation Officer recorded the statement under Section 161 the same day, CRPC He said he saw the suspect throw in the water. When further remand was denied, the inquiry officer took the blood and semen samples of the accused before sending them to the jail, and after obtaining the necessary permission from his superiors, such samples were sent to the laboratory with the apex court of the affected court. gone. In order to consider DNA, the investigating officer mistook the report, praising the impact of the correspondence discussed with the Doctor of Research Laboratory, ignoring the fact that the DNA report was recorded. , Especially the crime number of the current case is mentioned. On the record, the name of the deceased accused and the anal broom where the bail was granted ignoring the material evidence provided, these privileges may be returned. And in the present case, the following court, while granting bail or canceling the request for bail, completely ignored the fact that the body of the victim was found.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
