Find a Lawyer

MS. SAEEDA BILQUEES versus STATE

Articles 6 & 6 and 1 471 were convicted of criminal misconduct and use of fraudulent documents for 18 years during the trial and the accused appealed that he allegedly existed in his bank. 60,000 was deposited as rent. The bank investigation officer accused the fraudster of fraudulently comparing the accused's signature and the signature of the handwriting express with the signature of the accused, for his own profits by fraud. What was Neither was proven, nor was any positive evidence against it on record.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• SALMAN QURESHI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1095
• AHMED ICE AND COLD STORAGE through Partner v. KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. through Managing Director 2010 CLC 1100
• LACHMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1104
• RAHIM BUX v. MUHAMMAD MITHAL 2010 MLD 1105
• BABOO v. State 2010 MLD 1114
• Syed RIYASAT SHAH v. Malik AQEEL 2010 YLR 1114
• ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, KARACHI v. TRI STAR POWER LTD. 2010 CLD 1115
• IRFAN MAJEED v. UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI through Vice-Chancellor/Registrar, University Campus,Karachi 2010 PLC(CS) 1118

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law websites from FR DI Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes