Find a Lawyer

RAHIM BUX versus MUHAMMAD MITHAL

Section 262626 Penal Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 324 and 34 Attempt to Convict Applicant for Applicant Moved Trial from Trial to Court R Place to Session Case in Any Court Was. The place was vacant The complainant and the State Counsel did not object to the transfer of the matter to another court of competent jurisdiction `l \ since the vacancy was vacated and the case was adjourned for hearing. Was, coupled with the fact that the complainant as well as the State Counsel had no objection to such exchange, the matter was withdrawn from the file at the court place R at and the case was concluded within a period of four months. Upon instruction, he was transferred to court. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• JAMSHED AHMED AZMI v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 2010 PTD 1094
• SALMAN QURESHI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1095
• AHMED ICE AND COLD STORAGE through Partner v. KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. through Managing Director 2010 CLC 1100
• LACHMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1104
• Ms. SAEEDA BILQUEES v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1112
• BABOO v. State 2010 MLD 1114
• Syed RIYASAT SHAH v. Malik AQEEL 2010 YLR 1114
• ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, KARACHI v. TRI STAR POWER LTD. 2010 CLD 1115

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes