Find a Lawyer

KHALIL versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392/34 Robbery Compensation, Grant of Further Investigation Failed to present any evidence that could link the accused to the crime, twelve of the defendants delayed any The recovery of the arm did not take effect. Hours of filing and explaining the FIR through the prosecution were neither viable nor any recovery was assigned to the accused, nor was the robbery of the property recovered from the accused Prima Fike. Further investigation came out, the accused was, in the circumstances, admitted on bail

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 1472
• GHULAM ASGHAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1474
• M. MUHAMMAD SHAFI & CO. v. A. REHMAN ENTERPRISES 2010 CLC 1477
• MUHAMMAD MUKEEM alias MUKEEM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1479
• PAPOO alias AZHAR ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1486
• ZAHID ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1492
• Mst. SHAHANA BEGUM v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Senior Member, Board of Revenue 2010 CLC 1492
• ZULFIQAR AHMED v. Mst. RUBINA 2010 MLD 1496

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

best law firm from Upper Dir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes