The applicant for the illegal disposal of the section & disposition had held that he remained in judicial custody due to the registration of cases against him and in his absence his daughter was supervised by her daughter. ? The applicant's case was the defendant who was forcibly seized, on the other hand the plot respondent was claiming to buy the plot in question from the applicant and on the basis of his claim the sale agreement signed and signed by the applicant. Based on the letter of the jurisdiction over which only the court of civil jurisdiction can decide. Respondents' case for the specific performance of the cell contract was pending and the criminal court had no jurisdiction to determine the effect of the said document, even in strange circumstances, in the criminal jurisdictional court. It would not be appropriate for him to decide on what property he would own. After the sale of the plot, the petitioner had given the respondent a letter of re-occupation and possession or otherwise unless the court of jurisdiction decided the effect of the said documents on the occasion of civil proceedings. During the continuation of the criminal proceedings adversely affecting defendant's interest, an unknown order was upheld and a request for review was made. Dismiss
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
