Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IRFAN versus STATE

Attempts to commit Section 497 Interpretation Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Qatil AMD and Qital Ahmed bail were to be granted only temporary assessment and deep definition was also avoided at the bailout stage. The suspect was made from the occupation of the assigned role that he and a co-accused had apprehended, and another co-accused stole the deceased partner who allegedly struck theft, already He was granted bail and trial. The consistency suspect requires that bail may also be granted in favor of the accused on the basis of further investigation. It is not a definite rule that a fugitive should not be extended on bail under any circumstances, in which case

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ISMAIL SHAIKH v. State 2010 YLR 2792
• KHASTA KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 2807
• ATIF SHAHAB v. State 2010 YLR 2815
• FATEH ALI alias BARKAT ALI v. State 2010 YLR 2827
• Syed WASIM SHAH v. State 2010 YLR 2850
• MUHAMMAD USMAN FAROOQUI v. State 2010 YLR 2864
• PERVEZ v. State 2010 YLR 2874
• NASEER v. State 2010 YLR 2889

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

list of supreme court advocates from Ratto Dero lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes