HAJI MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus EMAAR GIGA KARACHI LIMITED
Sections 86 (1), 92 and 94 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. XXXX, RR 1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), sections 42 and 54 of the suit and declaration and injunction by the company 510 common shares are willing to issue. Ordinance of Companies, 1984, with the total value of the existing members by offering the right shares in proportion to the number of shares held to existing members under section 86 (1) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 Applications are requested to be displayed on the Board of Directors. In the meeting at which the unanimous resolution was approved, but their opinion was not deemed appropriate by the Board's request for the suspension operation of the invalid contract by the plaintiff, such company, if its article If authorized by the Association, may amend its terms of reference to extend it. The authorized capital and that too by passing the resolution at the General Meeting of the Board of Directors and obtaining the same approval from the Securities and Exchange Commission, neither the defendant's memorandum nor his authorized capital were altered to the extent of the authorized capital. The right shares were being offered through an invalid contract for the investor. The plaintiff company has taken an unlawful decision to improve its financial condition merely to achieve its intended purpose. 94 Ordinances of Companies, 1984 will not apply to current facts There was no fundamental blunt issue for defendant's order dismissed by the plaintiff The balance of the facility was not in favor of the plaintiffs' serious prejudice to the plaintiff's suspension This will lead to interim injunction
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
