The provisions contained in Section 21 (1) of Section 217 of the Drug Substances Act, section 21 (1) of the Drug Substances Act, sections 6, 9 and 21 of the Drug Substances Act, sections 6, 9, and 21. Was clearly prepared. In the present case, the intelligence indicated that there was an imminent movement of the intoxicants and elemental aspects, in which case the complainant could form this opinion and formulate an opinion that imminent action was necessary. And that the delay can either enable the accused to flee or otherwise deal with the drug in a way that can take them away from the jurisdiction of the law enforcement agencies because of an interdisciplinary There was no allegation of enmity. Raided and searched the premises where a large quantity of drugs were recovered to the accused, there was no basis for the claims presented to the accused saying that the accused had failed drugs and his brother had been prosecuted. I was successful. A reasonable case in which the accused is first charged with possession of a large quantity of drugs, which constitutes a crime under Section 6 of the Drug Substance Control Act, 1997, was accused of approving the bail. Failed to present a case for, was excluded
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
