RASHEED A. RAZVI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
RR 2 & 5 Sindh Government Notification ORI (5 GA & CD) 2 3/93, Dated 4 12 2008 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 4, 9, 14, 175 and 203 Constitution The petitioner's complaint was to be issued No section of the notification violated ORI (5 GA & CD) 2 3/93, Articles 4, 9, 14, 175 and 203 of the Constitution of 2008 and powers Was also against the ideology of separation of the judiciary and independence from the unity of the judiciary. In the case of Sharif Fardi v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 1989-404), a bench of seven members of the Sindh High Court had already legislated. Vs Sharf Fardi (PLD) 1994 SC) was upheld by the Supreme Court. 105) and following the instructions contained in the said decision, the Government of Sindh, in exercise of its power under section 26, enacted the Sindh Judicial Service Rules under the Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 to regulate the recruitment of Sindh Judicial Service. In which different terms are presented. For those serving in the Sindh Judicial Service Rules 1994 terms (prior to the issuance of anonymous notification) the position was that the selection process for the recruitment of civil judges / judicial magistrates was to be carried out by the Provincial Selection Board. Was. In the manner framed under R2 (e) of the Sindh Judicial Service Rules 1994, the appointment will be made on the basis of this recommendation by the Provincial Government \ Provincial Selection Board. However, with the issuance of Notification No. Section ORI (GA GGA and CD) 2 // 43 by the Sindh Government in this regard, the Sindh High Court has only the authority to pass the isition commission in this case. The formal status of sending the request to the requ
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
