Find a Lawyer

MUSHIQUE SANGAH versus STATE

In the appeal of section 302 (b) and 34 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), the value of the evidence was appealed by the legal heirs of the victim in the appeal case. The CRPC seeks permission to criminalize and other offenses under Section 454545 (5), calling for the CCP to accept the compromise and acquit them, saying that all the legal The pro-forma and affidavits cited by the heirs were also filed in which he said that he pursued them with no consideration and compensation. He was acquitted and that he waived his rights to the detainees and the accused. All the legal heritage appeared before the court and repeated their statement before the court, without holding any charge. And the culprits were punished and their pleas against evil were allowed, and the sons of the accused and the perpetrators were set aside and they were acquitted and released.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• RASHEED A. RAZVI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2010 PLD 63
• QALANDER BUX v. State 2010 PCrLJ 63
• MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR v. Malik ABID HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 68
• ABDUL KAREEM v. State 2010 MLD 71
• RAMZAN ALI HEMANI v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) 2010 MLD 75
• Syed MATLOOB AHMED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2010 PLC(CS) 76
• Mst. RUKHSAT BANO v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 77
• RANYAL TEXTILES through Proprietor/Employer v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.3, KARACHI 2010 PLC 80

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law websites from Ghizer lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes