Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMED versus MST. AZRAH

Section 25 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Transfer of Section 24 Case Principal Petitioner Demands Transfer of Application Under Section 25 Under the Gardens and Wards Act 1890, Such a case on the basis of a loss of belief in judicial justification Fodder was not available unless there was a litigation. This record is able to show that the judge has exhibited mismanagement or that he has intentionally committed disorderly conduct or that some prior circumstances were identified or other similar academic factors. The High Court had refused to move the case from one court to another. Applicants were dismissed simply because the applicant simply stated that he had lost trust in the trial court

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• KAMRAN MASIH v. State 2010 MLD 50
• ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Islamabad v. Mst. FARZANA SHABBIR 2010 MLD 54
• Syed MATANAT MOAZZAM BUKHARI v. Dr. ARFA SAEED 2010 CLC 58
• SHANKAR v. RANJHO 2010 YLR 61
• E.M. OIL MILL AND INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY through Managing Director v. COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN\'S COMPENSATION AND AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT 2010 PLC 62
• RASHEED A. RAZVI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2010 PLD 63
• QALANDER BUX v. State 2010 PCrLJ 63
• MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR v. Malik ABID HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 68

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

jobs for advocates from Blitang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes