Find a Lawyer

ROHTAS KHAN versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Qatil-e-Imti reported the matter in light of the evidence to the police immediately after the prosecution reported the matter, three credible witnesses testified about the incident. Was dismissed along with medical evidence that did not clear the testimony of the suspect for a long time. The trial court correctly accepted and accepted the prosecution's case at the expense of the defendant's unsubstantiated defense plea, no mitigating incident was in the record in favor of the defendant's sentence and death sentence. Stay in the situation

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• HUMAYUN GOHAR KHAN v. GUARDIAN JUDGE, OKARA 2010 MLD 1313
• MUHAMMAD ABBAS v. State 2010 YLR 1314
• HAMID ALI SHAH v. State 2010 YLR 1316
• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2010 YLR 1319
• PERVAIZ JOHN alias PERVAIZ MASIH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1321
• ATTIQUE AHMAD KHAN v. LESCO through Managing Director, PEPCO, WAPDA House, Lahore 2010 PLC(CS) 1322
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. SHAZIA BANO 2010 YLR 1327
• SHAH JAHAN KHAN v. FEDERAL SERVICE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE 2010 PLC(CS) 1333

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates phone number from Pir Mahal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes