Section Pre Pre-emption suit is alleged to have been exchanged for sale by the plaintiff and has never been transferred from the possession of the accused. Which was later transferred. The cousin / brother-in-law also had names of the defendant's witnesses in the present case, when he said that there was no attention paid to his presence, but there was no exchange for his remaining post. The land was transferred to the plaintiff's brother / brother by registered cell deed of 28 2004 2004 and then the defendant's wife was transferred by certified mutation on 7 2 2006 when During the evidence, the defendant did not provide any explanation as to how the suit land was eventually returned. His wife, however, expressed ignorance, which was not enough refusal of oral and documentary evidence that led to the exchange of claims. There was a sale and in the absence of proof to the contrary, the sale price was mentioned in the evidence of the plaintiff and the plaintiff \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
