SAFDAR NOOR COTTON GINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY versus GHULAM MUSTAFA
A. XXXVII, Rr 2, 3, O XXI, Rr 10 & 30 West Pakistan Relief of Indigenous Ordinance (XV of X60), Sections 2 and 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Receipt of money based on execution of Constitution checks Following the verdict of the trial suit for the plaintiff, the plaintiffs / plaintiffs filed an execution request. The plaintiff / decision maker submitted a request for installment of a defective amount of installment by the plaintiff accepting the request of the plaintiff with the condition that the defendant pay Rs 50,000 by the next date of hearing; And that if the defendant fails to pay the amount accordingly, the request submitted by the defendant for the non-declaration of an unspecified amount will be considered dismissal, not executed by the execution court order. Due to the dismissal of the defendant's request and an arrest warrant was issued. Defendants, who filed a constitutional petition. The plaintiff / decision lender was seeking asylum under the West Pakistan Relief of Undebate Nation Ordinance, 1960. According to section 2 (b) of the said ordinance, the loan would not be included in the loan for that purpose. ? The trade decision reveals that the parties had a common case, business and debt were taken forward, saying that the plaintiffs could not, under the circumstances, take advantage of the provisions of the West Pakistan Relief of Obedience Ordinance. Request dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
