Sections 497 of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 32 (1), 32A, 15 (F), 156 (1), (9), (14) and 178 guarantees, the approval of the prosecution case itself was relevant. Staff had initially cleared the export, but upon receipt of information received by Customs of Calcutta, the goods recovered through export bills were re-examined. And it turns out that Customs Department personnel were different from those who did not take any action against the beneficiaries, ie the investigating agency against the exporters was not the accused, who was merely the customs clearing agent, of their bars. Back in the last one year and the cases kept in his further imprisonment will not prove to be a worthwhile objective, considering the facts and circumstances of the detention, bail was granted after the arrest of the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
