SAJJAD AHMAD versus KHAN BROTHERS FLYING COACH SERVICE, MAILSI THROUGH PROPRIETOR
Section 42 contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), validation of section 3 passive numbers not complying with court order Plaintiff's contempt court sued for the impression that he had a wagon stand on the ground The construction is done and the defendants have no concern with it. In 1993, the construction of the wagon stand was demolished by authorities and the order was declared illegal by the authorities, explaining that the controversial wagon stand was located in a measles that did not belong to the department. He had no problem with it. After that and related measles thresholds, they will not interfere with the possession of the plaintiff The trial court dismissed the case because in light of the department's statement, the plaintiff filed a contempt of court petition because it followed the limit. Was not done To be made by either party, the trial court decided in favor of the plaintiff and attached the property of departure until the execution of the NTR order that the accused connected with the disputed property passed a contempt of court order passed by the trial court. Appeals were filed against him, which was allowed and the trial court was ordered to decide the contempt of court petition following the appropriate limitation of the disputed plaintiff. It was emphasized that the appellate court's unlawful order was illegal because the appellate court itself could record the evidence and the plaintiff's credible evidence was not properly justified by the fact that the appellate court directed that the appellate court first Was restricted. With the Department's statement in this case in 1994 that the limitation for further relations between the parties was invalidated
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
