Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY COLONIES, PUNJAB versus MST. WAZIRAN BIBI

Article 29 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 184 (1) and 1992 Maintaining a Constitutional Appeal The dispute between the two governments was presented before the High Court's decision to set aside the orders approved by the Federal Land Commission of the Federal Government. Demanded under which the provincial government was deprived of the benefit, the provincial government claimed that the constitutional application was enforceable and the provisions of Article 184 (1) of the constitution were not applicable. The High Court had earlier ruled on a similar law question and refused to change the view. The dispute between the provincial government and the federal government as discussed in Article 184 of the Constitution because the Member was a representative of the Federal Government under paragraph 29 of the Federal Land Commission Martial Law Regulations, 115 of the 1972 High Court in the allotment Refusal to intervene: Orders approved by Federal Land Commissions dismissed in pleadings

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• SAJJAD AHMAD v. KHAN BROTHERS FLYING COACH SERVICE, MAILSI through Proprietor 2010 CLC 313
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. State 2010 MLD 313
• Mst. RAHEELA SALAMAT v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FAISALABAD 2010 YLR 314
• Haji ABDUL JABBAR v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Secretary (Education), Punjab, Lahore 2010 MLD 315
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2010 YLR 320
• Mst. SEEMA HASSAN v. DISTRICT JUDGE RAWALPINDI 2010 MLD 323
• Mst. NASREEN AKHTAR v. PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Collector, Lahore 2010 YLR 324
• HAQ NAWAZ v. ABDUL KHALIQ 2010 CLD 324

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

top advocate from Takhtbai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes