The Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the 202020 Fraudulent and Unlawful Acceptance Benefit of Suspicion Initially, the case against the accused is initially registered under Section 161, PPC Was made, but the trial court summoned the accused under section 420. , Under section 5 (2) of the PPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, it was alleged that the Deputy Commissioner did not mention any witnesses in the petition filed by the complainant before the Inquiry Officer. had gone. It was also found that the complainant did not have any documentary evidence or oral evidence. On the complaint grievance commission, he made unambiguous improvement in his investigation that at the time of the money / illegal release of the accused, the prosecution's witnesses were present, the prosecution's witnesses also improved the statement and the accused Let's try to connect with the commission of crime. Prosecutor's witnesses did not mention the date, time and place of any witnesses' names were not mentioned by the complainant to receive the money through the accused, but later the statements of the two witnesses were retained. And the accused was subjected to dishonesty, who was a deputy convict IV employee since 1995 and suffered a lot. The trial court convicted the accused and set him free and dismissed the charges by giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
