MISS SAIMA BUKHARI versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, RAJANPUR
Article 12 (2) and 114 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction to set aside this decision approved by the High Court, by the applicants under Section 12 (2) CPC Was declared a result of fraud. The applicants of the misrepresentation argued that if the decision passed by the High Court could not be kept under Section 12 (2), CPC, then their petitions could be turned into review petitions. The challenge, valid under section 12 (2), is that the CPC will issue a verdict on the verdict and order. A request for fraud, misrepresentation or jurisdiction can only be made by applying to this forum as all the facts and documents were part of the record and before the High Court, the petitioner cannot be heard in the complaint. This order was obtained by him. Fraudulent or misleading, the High Court specifically cited several documents on which he felt satisfied and directed the authority under it. It is feared to exercise their authority properly, all the facts and the documents relied upon by the applicants were available on record at the time of the order passed in the constitutional petition, therefore, the High Court rejected the petition. I refused to change because it would not be in accordance with the law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
