KARACHI PIPE MILLS THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, CIVIL SECRETARIAT LAHORE
O XVII, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 54 Suit for Permanent Order Prohibition Plaintiff has failed to produce evidence despite several dates for this purpose, the right to the Tender Evidence O XVII, R Was closed under 3. The CPC decided by the trial court trial court to decide on the merits of the case and complied with its ruling and decree, dismissing the appeal filed by the plaintiff through the trial, which was approved by the trial court. Yet, the appellate court's competence was dismissed by the plaintiff. After a lapse of five years, the tender evidence was not available before the trial court. The last and last opportunity was not taken by the plaintiff and its evidence was sealed and the matter was decided on the basis of the material available on the record. On the basis of which there was no justification or reason. The infective may be intercepted in an unknown case, even though the review memo did not provide any basis for which it could be assumed that the lower courts had acted. ith a material jurisdiction or plaintiff's case that a decision of the jurisdiction was found to be absolutely good under the law, an application for review of the judgment was dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
