Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, TOBA TEK SINGH

Special Oath Impact Case between the OO Act (X of X 187373), Article Constitution10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petitions, was decided by the Family Court on special affidavit on Hood Kuron. The defendant applied. By petitioner it was held that the courts below did not appreciate the defendant's offer to forfeit special oath by the applicant. Once an offer is made by one party and accepted by the other party, the offer cannot be rejected by the party. Under this case, which obliged the decision to be accepted by the other party to the statement of acceptance by the other party was in the nature of a binding agreement and the decision passed by the Family Court and the Lower Appellate Court confirmed it. Was Any unlawful interference or material irregularity or judgment and judgment passed by the jurisdiction of the Exchequer or that they were misguided in nature. The High Court denied the interference by two courts under a constitutional petition. Things were dismissed before hearing the adjudication and the order was \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Mst. NAZLI v. MUHAMMAD ILYAS 2010 MLD 477
• Miss SAIMA BUKHARI v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, RAJANPUR 2010 CLC 478
• Syed ALI ABBAS GARDEZI v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 478
• QAMAR ABBAS v. State 2010 YLR 480
• BASHIR AHMED v. NATIONAL COLLEGE OF ARTS through Principal, National College of Arts 2010 PLC(CS) 485
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, Lahore 2010 MLD 486
• HAMID GHANI v. MUHAMMAD BASIT SIDDIQUI 2010 PLD 487
• ELGA CONTROLS through Proprietor v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2010 PTD 487

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates phone number from Gari Mori lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes