UMAR NAJEEB KHAN LODHI versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH VICE CHANCELLOR
Article 199 Constitution Petition for Cancellation of Admission to Admission During the Educational Institution for the Arts, the petitioner supported the order under which the applicant's admission to the Fine Arts course was canceled because the applicant was required to enter the application for admission. At the time, the applicant was over the age and was invited and after a thorough examination the candidates were selected and awarded the admission which was admitted after completing the first semester, B design education course in the same department. I applied for a transfer because one student had already moved to another department And the seat was empty. Initially the applicant's application was approved, but his application was rejected at the final approval stage and his fine arts admission was canceled on the grounds that he was over the age of admission, The petition for the petition filed by the applicant was examined, the dues were paid and the admission was properly dropped. Once the applicant was admitted, his admission could not be canceled on that basis. That she is older because the petitioner has entered this right when the petitioner made her first Had passed the semester when his admission was over. Not only does it sit on the vacant seat for the rest of the year, it will neither benefit the university nor any other applicant, and if it is exchanged in the B design, it will have no future. The possibilities will be at stake. She was not allowed to be just because she was over the age, then went to B design course
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
