SAHIWAL ANJUMAN-I-ARTIAN versus GULZAR AND SONS THROUGH PROPRIETOR
A VII, R 2, O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 and Section 115 Application for Acceptance of a Temporary Temporary Order With the Disposal of the Claimant of the Application Requesting Acceptance of Temporary Order As well as applying for an attachment, the decision was dismissed by the trial court's reviewing jurisdiction for review purposes, and the decision could not be made as to whether the suit was approved. Whether the order should be issued during the stay or not, all that the High Court can do. It was considered whether, in the circumstances of this case, the decision to apply for a temporary injunction could be postponed to a date until the filing of a written statement, to postpone the decision on the application for trial. The trial court had no jurisdiction for the matter. Provision of temporary restraining order In such a situation, when the matter has been postponed to a date after prolonged summer holidays, the interim RLF should have been given a controversial interim order, neither given the impression of refusal nor Acceptance As long as the defendants were served, the order should have been issued and the trial court may only refuse a temporary injunction after the respondents have received a response. The trial court had no knowledge of the scheme of law directed by the High Court; in the circumstances, the trial court will temporarily decide the application for suspension of the order, even if the court adjourns the matter for a shorter date. And the same decision has to be made under good qualities. An order issued by a trial court, all purposes
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
