Find a Lawyer

SIGNAGE SECURITY SYSTEM (PVT.) LTD. versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Sections 16 (4) and 49B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Contract Label Petitioner Company was contracted for five years to collect the toll on the basis of Blood, Operate and Transfer (BOT). But the authorities took over the possession of the applicant of the toll plaza before the expiry of the due date was taken up by the applicant that the possession was taken without issuing the necessary notice. The validity petitioner withheld the BOT fee payment to the Capital Development Authority from January 2009, and was also obliged to extend the site's development work, which was stopped even if it was due to an explosion at the Marriott Hotel. Happened or was given to the aggrieved applicant who withheld payment or was designed to harm the public treasury, which were controversial questions of fact that could not be resolved. Recording of the evidence was a matter of contractual obligation and the parties could proceed to arbitration under the agreement but the Constitution PIL's request was not upheld, under which the petition was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• SAHIWAL ANJUMAN-I-ARTIAN v. GULZAR AND SONS through Proprietor 2010 MLD 558
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2010 YLR 560
• ABID HUSSAIN KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 564
• HIGH NOON TEXTILE LTD through Authorized Attorney v. SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT CO. (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Attorney 2010 CLD 567
• MODEL TOWN COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. through Managing Committee v. SECRETARY COOPERATIVES 2010 MLD 568
• Mst. SHABINA NAZ v. Malik ANJUM ZAHOOR 2010 YLR 569
• Sheikh JAMEEL AHMAD v. Raja KHALID HUSSAIN 2010 CLD 571
• SADAR ANJUMAN-E-AHMEDIA through General Attorney v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (AUDIT DIVISION), FAISALABAD 2010 PTD 571

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

ask a advocate free from Mir Ali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes