Section 302 (a) (b) definition of evidence in reduction, reduction of cases to reduce sentence, if any delay in filing of FIR, has been a motivating part of the incident as no enmity despite denial. Didn't exist. There is no dispute about the location and location of the parties, but the way of the incident was controversial. The prosecutor's case was that the accused fired at the deceased while the missing participant delivered the victim to Japan which resulted in the shooting. I also received firearm injuries. The accused complainant, who was the real brother of the victim, reasonably explained his presence on the occasion, and the defense could not do anything from the testimony of him that is consistent with all the material details of the other prosecutor's witnesses. On the ground, he also reasonably proved that the witness witnessed the incident was in accordance with medical evidence presented by the doctor who conducted a post-mortem examination. The prosecution case also helped the nation recover two crimes on the dead body. Millie, who was taken into custody, proved by prosecution witnesses, in connection with the eviction of France The Zuck Science Laboratory report was a positive indictment, beyond any doubt its case against the accused turned out to be an indictment because in such cases, the change was a rare occurrence and in the circumstances the punishment of the accused was maintained. Under 2302 (b), PPC and not section 2302 (a), under PPC because the requirement of section 30302 (a) of PPC did not prove, however, that mitigating circumstances exist in favor of the accused. Were. It was unclear what really happened on the spot, despite the fact that Mills
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
