Arts 199 (1) (b) (ii), 62 (f), 63 (i), 238, 239 and 264 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 6 General Election Order Practices (7 of 2002) ), Article 8 A Representation for the Public Act (LXXXV of 1976), Registered Voters Regarding Section 99 Constitution Petitioner challenged Quetta Warranto Petitioners from holding their constituency to the National Assembly of Pakistan. Failing to prove that the required educational qualification did not have a defendant in accordance with Article 8A of the General Election Order, 2002, the applicants could not prove that the respondent was not an honest person as in Article 62 (f). It is believed that the Constitution was represented with Section 99 of the Public Representation Act, 1976, however, it was proved that the respondents were punished for their corruption and dismissed from their jobs, 194 1977. But the dismissal of the respondents in accordance with Article 63 (i) of the Constitution after the Constitution (Eighteenth) Amendment Act, 2010 Council (Pakistan Om service based on the mismanagement of the five-year period to become a member of parliament) has not been declared ineligible now. The provisions of Section 99 of the Public Representation Act, 1976, although not amended, cannot repeal Article 63 (i) of the Constitution, which still stands today to disqualify an individual. do not have. As a Member of Parliament, if five years had elapsed after his dismissal, five years had elapsed after the defendant was dismissed from his job, so, to qualify for that position. No inconvenience was encountered. At the time of filing the constitutional petition and its decision
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
