The trial court and the appellate court, in order to prosecute section 13 and 13, were dismissed primarily by the trial court and the appellate court on the ground that the student molestation was not properly performed by the plaintiff, both by the defendant. The question of performance was discussed at length below by the courts and, consequently, concluded that the performance requirements of the pool were not met. Acknowledged that the petitioner in the law of the magistrate was authorized to be the informant and the physical presence of the two witnesses, and stated that the main component of the case was missing because the plaintiff was informed by telephone. And they received information, but in the absence of any misunderstanding, the findings of the two courts in the case in the presence of two true witnesses, in which case the case was not properly performed. , Were inconceivable if they did not read the evidence or the material was illegal. , The conclusions reached by the two courts below cannot be interfered with by the High Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
