Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SAHIWAL versus ZAFAR MAHDI

Section 54 Permanent Plaintiff Trial Plaintiffs Who Owned The Shop Under Question The tenant / corporation hired by a corporation was declared illegal by the government; the plaintiff received no corporation rent. And the shop was sealed and the claimant never received it. The rent was paid to the plaintiff from the time the shop received no rent and they continue to pay the property tax to the claimant of the excise department after paying the rent, not paying the rent. The notice issued to the plaintiffs, which was not demanded, was illegal and illegal. No illegal or material irregularities were shown in illegal decisions and following court orders, review request dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL SOHAIL v. ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER 2010 YLR 538
• QAMAR ABBAS v. INSPECTR-GENERAL OF POLICE, (PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER), PUNJAB 2010 PLC(CS) 538
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR SHERAZI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI 2010 YLR 540
• MUHAMMAD ADNAN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, WAZIRABAD, DISTRICT GUJRANWALA 2010 PCrLJ 541
• WAQAR AHMAD v. DIRECTOR PUBLIC INFORMATION (COLLEGES), PUNJAB GOVERNMENT, LAHORE 2010 PLC(CS) 546
• IMRAN HUSSAIN v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman WAPDA 2010 PLD 546
• AFTAB AHMAD v. State 2010 YLR 546
• GHULAM SHABBIR v. DIN MUHAMMAD 2010 CLC 549

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Manga Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes