MUHAMMAD TAHIR SHERAZI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI
Section 5, Schedule, Section 10 (4) and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application suit for dissolution of marriage, retrieval and rehabilitation of dowry articles decided under section 10 (4) of West Pakistan. had gone. In the Family Courts Act, 1964, the plaintiffs were not given the dowry articles by their own admission before the formation of restitution and rehabilitation cases related to the dowry articles, but they claimed that the dowry articles were from abroad. After returning from overseas, they were purchased where they were headed. The plaintiff's evidence that her husband's receipts for buying Daisy's articles were from her pre-wedding dates had many flaws in the plaintiff's evidence as to why her version would be credible. Had, however, neglected and approved the most appropriate points. Without reading the evidence, the decision and the order to maintain the defendant's retaining amount, in view of the fact, was completely without qualification. The cap he was working in Dubai and was quite well off, the High Court restored. The court agreed to the observations below the amount, however, and amended the extent of the maintenance allowance for minors, which was increased by 10%. Except for the amendment to the rehabilitation allowance granted to the minor, both applications were rejected without merit.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
