MUHAMMAD IQBAL SOHAIL versus ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER
Section 17 (2) (i) (8) and 24 Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), the tenant's withdrawal in pursuance of the order of eviction of the tenant by default in payment of section 3 rent, Was gone, but the landlord intra-court appealed on the basis that certain amount of rent was against the tenant and directed the landlord to pay the same. The homeowner's request for review cannot be allowed if some of the tenants were taken to the tenant, the landlord was treated in addition to filing a civil lawsuit for his recovery, as well as the section of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972 In view of the bar contained in 3 (2), the appeal was not worthwhile as the appeal was dismissed under section 24 of the Cantonment Rent Relations Act, 1963. Due to a misunderstanding, excluded
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
