Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR versus LIAQAT ALI


Section 42 Sue for Plaintiff asserts that the suit land was allotted in 1959 under the Guru Gore Mode Food Scheme, which was given by the Collector under the proprietary right of 5 6 1976, which was hereafter referred to The appeal against the order was dismissed. Before the Board of Revenue, the review request was dismissed, the plaintiff affirmed the above three orders of the Revenue Authorities through a civil suit trial court. The father of the accused fraudulently obtained the suit in his favor and the plaintiff, being a minor, was not entitled to the allotment. Appeal was preferred before the Appellate Court, which was accepted at the time of the petitioner The plaintiff was underage in failing to prove that the appellate court correctly set aside the judgment passed by the trial court petition. ?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Kotla Pathan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.