Section 392 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (E) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 in the parade and litigation statements identifying persons related to robbery, kidnapping for ransom and possessing weapons. Identified. Witnesses said that against the defendants, the investigating officer had full support from the evidence contained by the police officer, as well as other police officials fully supported and corroborated the evidence presented by the prosecution's witnesses. , The prosecution's witnesses at the trial were extensively examined, but nothing was found to be favorable by their defense, saying that the prosecution's witnesses were truthful and presented a credible account of the incident. And it is said that Saeed witnesses to link the incident in a very respectful and satisfactory way. I have succeeded, the delay in filing an FIR, if any was attributed to the police and no adverse indication could be taken against it. However, the complainant's delay, however, was merely irregular, with no one on the prosecution's case. There was no adverse effect, the defense plea said, adding that the co-accused said that they were falsely implicated in the case, they were lacking and that they remained neutral in the case, the circumstances were successful. The co-accused was convicted and sentenced to prove their case against, saying that the co-accused were retained periodically.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
