Find a Lawyer

ZAWAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

The defendant's grant was designated, but a In addition to the injury, all the others were declared negligent offenses with which the accused was being charged, which did not fall under the prohibited clause of Section 497, CRPC. While the accused had been in jail since 16-12 2008, the accused was admitted to bail without any special progress in the trial,

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• IMDAD ULLAH v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector/D.O.R., Khanewal 2010 YLR 869
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Collector 2010 MLD 870
• Mst. NUSRAT MALIK SALEEM v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman 2010 CLD 870
• AJMAL RAFIQUE v. PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD OF LIQUIDATION, LAHORE 2010 CLC 873
• MUHAMMAD ARSLAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 875
• Mst. SHAZIA ZAHEER v. MUHAMMAD FAISAL 2010 MLD 881
• MUHAMMAD AKMAL v. TRUST LEASING INVESTMENT BANK through General Manager 2010 CLD 888
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector v. LIAQAT ALI 2010 MLD 888

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates email from Shakargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes