Sections 302 (b) and 459 of the Morning and Traumatic Injury caused panic in the house or breaking into the house while the testimony of the evidence to be appreciated was 2/2 KM nor the name of the accused in the FIR. No details were taken, no identification parade was held in the case. The complainant stated that he had sustained three wounds on the suspect's person, one on his head and the other on his back, but police conducted a medical examination of the suspect to confirm the version of the complainant listed in the FIR. No, the prosecution's two witnesses provided evidence of extra-judicial confession, but said that the witnesses did not arrest the accused or inform the police or the complainant on the same day, but were informed two days later. And there is no comprehensible explanation available in this regard, when the case recovered from the accused by Samba's original restitution memo prosecution Neither was presented, no collusion can be made by the prosecution as it has been stated that the recovery prosecution failed to prove its case against the accused without any doubt, at the trial. The trial and sentence against the accused were set aside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
