Section 1 561 Because a false case was registered against the applicant against the FIR applicant or the complainant had some material evidence, it was not clear from the record that the challan had already been submitted. , Was relied upon by the prosecution. In question, whether the applicants were found innocent or guilty through investigation, it was also not brought before the High Court and it was not shown that the prosecution failed to record any evidence against the applicant. Was. The report did not show that the crime took place in 1961 or 1959, however, the FIR has made it clear that the crime was committed shortly thereafter. This should have happened before 1998, when numerous questions were raised in the FIR which could not be brought into question by the High Court; the applicants could have made a similar protest before the trial court. , Which will be considered. Evidence available on record and, if necessary, evidence of the prosecution, and then strictly determine the case according to the law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
