MIAN AYAZ ANWAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY INTERIOR
Section 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition Placing an individual on the Execution Control List \ Public Interest \ Scope Bank's default petitioner alleges that he committed default in payment of over Rs 100 million bank loan. Is. Regarding the Exit Control List by the authorities, the applicant was named that the applicant was named in the Exit Control List in the public interest as the same people also entered their criteria on the Exit Control List. What the applicant had raised. Didn't this bank default make the interest interest public offseason in any way necessary to keep the applicant's name in the Exit Control List? The public interest publican was not employed to examine the reasons / prohibitions of traveling abroad `The public interest requirement could not be met when applying the applicant's name to the Exit Control List, as he had filed the Sec. Has adopted the constitutional status of 2 since the Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981, suspected that it could be used to discriminate as a result of which it could elect the federal government as long as the copy of the defaulter's `person of There was no judicial proceeding banned, there was no risk of merely being unfaithful. The public interest record was not put on record to prove that the applicant was required in the bank fraud case or that criminal proceedings against the applicant were initiated under the banking rules, therefore, it was not established. It was reported that the applicant's `person 'was needed. There was no evidence on the public interest record record that could have satisfied the High Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
