Section 573 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Scope of XML, RR 23, 24, 25 and 26 and Scope of XLI, Rr 23, 24, 25 and 26, CPC suit based on this change. Is challenging what was illegal. , The trial court ruled that it was fraudulent and allegedly ineffective against the rights of the accused and the plaintiff, but the appellate court held the trial court's decision and order aside to consider the available documents on record cases. After the trial was passed to the trial court. X23 of A23; CPC cites a situation where the trial case was settled at a preliminary point and this ruling was reversed in OXL's Appeal Roll 24, CPC court. Gives the power to decide the matter itself where the evidence on the record is sufficient, Rule 25 of the OCLC where the trial court may have waived the case or the trial and enabled the appellate court to decide the case. Go to trial and send it to trial in the court whose order the appeal was preferred Order XLI, R 26, how the CPC handled the matter. The proceedings listed on the latest issues made under Rule 25 of the OXLI, the CPC-imposed decisions and decrees, revealed that the Appellate Court O XLI, in Rules 23, 24, 25 and 26 of the CPC In the absence of any situation the matter has proceeded to seek remand. It has been stated that the provisions of law do not allow the appellate court to obtain a trial remand for failure to decide a case for recording the trial court's presence. The appellate court remanded the trial court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010