SHAKEEL ANWAR HAMDANI versus SYEDA SHABANA GILLANI
For the last two years, the right of direct closure of witnesses on the suit for the recovery of articles of Article Pakistan and Section and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, has been pending for the last two years, in which the defendant has against the former Part. Twice the action was made which showed that the defendant was trying, considering the defendant's repetition from the case length, the Family Court was compelled to pass this unreasonable order under which the defendant's witnesses were examined. Respondent's right to investigate was discontinued; the law did not provide any appeal / revision to the status of family laws. Matters needing to be settled urgently The impeachment order was not only annexed to the authority but it was also justified in approving the anonymous order demanding the intervention of the High Court in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. There is nothing illegal or illegal to do.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
