Article 40 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), AXXI, R 35 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Symbol Occupation The plaintiff's challenge to the granting of a gift change and claiming its share in the property. What was To the extent of 1 / 8th of the possession of the same suit, the defendants contested on the basis that the plaintiff was entitled to only 1 / 8th of the disputed land, symbolic possession of the entire land could not be allowed. , The trial court dismissed the trial. The plaintiff's appellate court accepted the appeal on the grounds that the decision was upheld until the Court of Appeal began proceedings and rejected the decree. Significantly, the order of legitimate appeal to occupy the whole land revealed that the gift change in favor of the defeated was nontinued in favor of the forerunner, and the legacy has been restored under which the whole of 200 kanal. All the parties to the property became joint owners with respect to the property, the First Appellate Court correctly granted the plaintiff a symbolic possession by strictly executing this decree in accordance with OK XXI, R 35 (2), CPC High Court refuses to interfere with first appellate court's findings in constitutional petition dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
