Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM PERVAIZ versus MUHAMMAD ARIF

For the specific performance of the Section 12 suit oral agreement, the trial court dismissed the appeal that the appellate court accepted the evidence on the ground that the evidence was recorded by a court reader, not by the presiding officer, An unwanted verdict and order was set aside and the case was remanded. In the trial court. Hidarity remanded the appellate court remanding the case on merit and said that the appellate court could not decide the appeal on the basis that the reader had recorded the evidence, instead that the decision should have been made on merit. ?

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MANZOOR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD SAIN 2010 CLC 789
• MAHMOOD AKHTAR KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 790
• JAN MUHAMMAD alias JANOO v. Mst. AMEERAN BIBI 2010 MLD 790
• MUHAMMAD MANAWAR v. NAZIR AHMAD 2010 CLC 791
• GHULAM RAZA SAJID v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 CLD 792
• MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE SAHIWAL NOW TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SAHIWAL v. Hafiz MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2010 YLR 793
• NISAR alias SHADA v. MUHAMMAD SAEED SAFDAR 2010 CLC 794
• RIYASAT ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 795

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocates from Chishtian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes